Links for 6-22-2018

Links for 4-10-2017

Links for 2-23-2017

  • Donald Trump told Reuters that he wants to expand America’s nuclear arsenal. Trump also complained about Russia’s violations of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty.

  • Paul Mirengoff argues that Donald Trump’s nomination of Alex Acosta as Secretary of Labor is bad news for conservatives:

    But the most relevant consideration is Acosta’s record in the Justice Department under President Bush, first as Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Civil Rights Division and then as Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division. Sources say his record is not conservative.

    They say that during his time at DOJ, Acosta’s priority wasn’t the advancement of the administration’s policy goals. Rather, it was to stay on the good side of left-wing civil rights groups.

    Acosta sought to accomplish this primarily by meeting their demands to bring certain kinds of cases and by not bringing cases the left didn’t like. But Acosta’s appeasement of the left seems to have gone further than that. I’m told that in crunch time during the 2004 election, he was more accommodating to the Democrats than to the Republicans on voting issues with the potential to influence the outcome.

  • Two Chinese dissidents argue that Donald Trump is right on China and trade:

    During the 1992 U.S. presidential campaign, Governor Bill Clinton harshly criticized Bush for “kowtowing” to China, echoing a not-uncommon conservative critique of the American response to the Tiananmen massacre. There was a vigorous debate over whether to continue linking China’s Most Favored Nation (MFN) trade status with its human-rights improvements. But one year after assuming the presidency, President Clinton reversed the policy on the theory — widely supported by American corporations, columnists, pundits, and lawmakers — that robust trade would inevitably result in prosperity and the growth of the Chinese middle class, which would in turn demand more political freedom.

    Subsequent history has demonstrated the folly of this line of thinking.


    President Trump must keep his promise to be tough on unfair trade practices that harm America. With China currently relying on the U.S. and other big markets to keep its already faltering economy afloat, Trump has significant leverage, and he must use it to press for real Chinese economic liberalization, withdrawing China’s permanent MFC status and linking it to the removal of trade barriers and liberalization of all sectors, as well as to human-rights improvements. Workers in both China and America will thank him for the resulting improvement in their lives.

  • Heather Mac Donald writes on the riots accompanying Milo Yiannapoulos scheduled appearance at the University of California Berkeley:

    Several Berkeley professors circulated emails downplaying the significance of the violence. Déborah Blocker, associate professor of French, reported to her fellow profs about the anarchy on campus: “Mostly this was typical Black Bloc action, in a few waves —very well-organized and very efficient. They attacked property but they attacked it very sparingly, destroying just enough University property to obtain the cancellation order for the MY event and making sure no one in the crowd got hurt” [emphasis in original]. (In fact, a woman was pepper-sprayed while giving an interview and her husband was beaten so badly that several ribs were broken, among other assaults on campus.)


    Taylor’s analysis provides a window into the future. Absent a radical change in police morale, periodic rioting and assaults on perceived Trump supporters and other disfavored persons will likely continue. Those assaults began before the inauguration; they have continued since then. In the Black Lives Matter era, police officers are hunkered down, fearful of using lawful tactics that will be labelled racist by politicians and the mainstream media. This is not just a Bay Area phenomenon. The listless response to the Baltimore rioting in 2015 anticipated the Berkeley passivity. The ideology of victimhood, pumped into the body politic by universities, easily morphs into a justification not just for the suppression of speech but also for violent resistance to imagined oppressors. College graduates have been told for years that the U.S. is systemically racist and unjust; the rioters’ nauseating sense of entitlement to destroy other people’s property and to sucker-punch ideological foes is a natural extension of this profound delegitimation of the American polity.

  • The Dakota Access pipeline protest camp is empty. About 39 people were arrested on the last day.

  • A group of lawyers who worked for the Obama administration formed a nonprofit called United to Protect Democracy, which will file lawsuits against the Trump administration.

  • A strange racketeering lawsuit in North Carolina involving tobacco sales suggests that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives was involved in an off-the-books scheme to fund its undercover operations.

  • Project Veritas started releasing audio that was secretly recorded inside CNN’s headquarters in 2009.

  • The U.S. Air Force appears to have purchased a system from an Israeli company that counteracts small drones like the ones ISIS uses.

  • Russia plans to deploy troops to the Kuril Islands this year. Japan and Russia both claim ownership of these islands.

  • Chinese President Xi Jinping promised Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte that China would not build structures on Scarborough Shoal, one of the disputed islands in the South China Sea.

  • The Danish government has been paying welfare benefits to people fighting in Syria for ISIS.

  • Former NATO Secretary General and Prime Minister of Denmark, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, says America must lead, even if it doesn’t want to. He’s also written a book about this.

Links for 1-18-2017

Links for 12-26-2016

  • Heather Mac Donald writes on the connection between immigration policy and terrorism, as exemplified by the Berlin truck attack:

    Even if the number of illegal-alien criminals in the U.S. who commit terrorism is small, using immigration laws to prevent even one such attack is patently justified. And even if there were no illegal-alien criminals in the U.S. who committed terrorism, deporting aliens who commit crime is nevertheless a just and sound policy. Communities do not benefit from criminals in their midst. Sanctuary scofflaws ritually claim that honoring federal immigration detainers might discourage illegal-alien victims from reporting crime, but federal immigration authorities are seeking to deport criminals, not their victims.

    The apprehension of Anis Amri by Italian police vindicates another challenged law-enforcement practice as well: proactive policing. Two Milanese officers, Cristian Movio and Luca Scata, observed a disheveled man loitering outside a northern Milanese Metro station at 3 a.m. They stopped him to ask some questions and check his identity papers. Amri quickly pulled out a gun and started shooting at them; he was fatally shot in return. Had the Black Lives Matter movement taken hold in Italy, with its specious charge that pedestrian stops are a means of racial oppression, the two officers might well have taken the less politically risky course of walking past Amri rather than acting on their reasonable suspicion that something needed checking out.

    There is no reason to protect illegal-alien criminals from deportation. And cities that defy the law should face serious consequences. If Anis Amri had been jailed in San Francisco for stealing a car and had been in the country illegally, the San Francisco sheriff, with the support of the city’s board of supervisors, would have provided him safe passage back to the “community.” President Trump’s response to the wave of Islamic terrorism should include new screening for people coming in. But it should also make sure that people in the country illegally be promptly deported when they go on to commit further crimes. Such a policy is essential to preserving safety and the rule of law.

  • Abby Schachter writes on American governmental agencies dictating how children are raised:

    There are two important lessons to draw from all this government-run child-rearing. The first is how improperly we are defining private life and public life. Only in a world where a healthy population is defined as a public good can the state justify breaking apart families over a health problem that will cause no harm to anyone but the sufferers.

    The second lesson is that there are both individual parents and groups of advocates across the country who are focused on returning the rights of parents to raise their own children. These parents — Captain Mommies and Daddies, I call them — have had run-ins with the overbearing state and decided to advocate on their own behalf and on behalf of their kids. Then there are organizations like the Family Defense Center, which provides legal defense for parents caught in the child-welfare and legal systems. At the goal is to amend the U.S. Constitution and support state laws to empower parents. And the National Association of Parents wants to shape public policy on parents’-rights issues through education and advocacy.

  • Ninety-nine years ago today, President Woodrow Wilson nationalized the entire railroad system.

  • Recep Tayyip Erdogan is Turkey’s new Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, and that’s not a good thing for American interests.

  • Britain’s Royal Air Force will shift its focus from Iraq to Syria next year.

Links for 7-18-2016

Links for 7-6-2016